A Comparative Study on Free Will Among Preparatory School Students in Public and Private Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25130/sc.25.1.28Keywords:
- free will - private schools - public schoolsAbstract
The researcher dealt in his research with freedom of will and used the descriptive approach with the comparative method. The research community included students of government and private schools in the city of Mosul, numbering 8,000, with 6,000 students in government schools and 2,000 students in private schools. The research sample consisted of 480 students, with (225) students from government schools and (225) students from private schools, who were chosen in the manner and the objectives of the research were to identify the degree of freedom of will for middle school students in government and private schools and to identify the level of variation between them. The researcher assumed that there were no differences in the degree of freedom of will between students in government and private schools, and the statistical package SPSS was used in processing the data. The researcher also concluded that there was a variation in the level of freedom of will for the lesson Physical education among these schools, and there are significant differences between these schools, in favor of private school students. The researcher recommended conducting a study to determine the relationship between the degree of free will and other variables among middle school students, and developing guidance programs for middle school students to develop free will.
References
14. Beni,Stephanie, Fletcher, Tim , ORCID Icon and Déirdre Ní Chróinín (2017): "Meaningful Experiences in Physical Education and Youth Sport": A Review of the Literature, 69,p.p. 291–312.
15. Burgoon,M.,Alvaro, Eusebio M,.,Grandpre,J. & Voulodakis, Michael.(2002): "Revisi ng the theory of psychological reactance" , the Persuasion handbook :Developments in theory and prac ce,.ln J. P. Dillard & M.pfau(Eds) Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage, pp.213 232.
16. Cracker, L. & Algiam, J. (1986): Introduction to Classical and Modern test Theory، New York:(BS) College Publishing، p 125.
17. Filevich,E,Vanneste,P.,Brass,M.,Fias,W.& Haggard,P.(2013): "Brain correlates of subjective freedom of chocice", Consciousness and cogni on.No.(22),pp.1271-1284.
18. Henri,Tilga , Hanna, Kalajas Tilga,Vello Hein and Lennart Raudsepp (2021):" Effects of a Web Based Autonomy Supportive Intervention on Physical Education Teacher Outcomes",Education Sciences, Vol 11(7), p.p 2 14.
19. Lyubomisky, Sonja,King, Laura and Diener, Ed (2005): "The benefits of frequentposi ve a ect: does happiness lead to success?", Psychol.Bull Vol.131,p.p.803 855.
20. Marta, Leyton-Román, Juan L, Núñez and Ruth, Jiménez-Castuera (2020): " The Importance of Supporting Student Autonomy in Physical Education Classes to Improve Intention to Be Physically Active ", Sustainability, Vol 12(10):4251.
21. Omoregie, jesse (2015): "Freewill: The degree of freedom within", University of Bolton, UK: Author House.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sport culture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY LICENSE. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/